Unethical Conduct at Doongerwadi
A follow up to this article is titled “Ervad Hathiram’s Editorial on the Doongerwadi Incident”
The below is a letter sent to Parsi Khabar by Minoo K Vaghchhipawalla
Minoo writes…
Unethical and unprofessional conduct by the “Man of God” viz. the Priest
Recently my brother Phiroz K Vaghchhipawalla, a resident of Godrej Baug passed away. We decided that up-to the four days ceremonies I.e. Charam, to be conducted at the Doongarwadi and thereafter will be performed at the Jokhi Agiary. Accordingly, my sister-in-law contacted Mrs. Maharukh P Madan and handed over the task.
On the morning of 15th April 2010, two priests viz. Mr. Jal Balsara and Mr. Dara Karanjia came to conduct Gehsarna ceremony. After about 15 minutes, suddenly Mr. Jal Balsara stopped praying half-way through and left the place in a huff, abusing his fellow dastur Mr.Dara Karanjia. All of us, including other mourners who had come to pay their last respect and homage to my dead brother were shocked and aghast to notice this horrible conduct of Mr. Jal Balsara.
We immediately rushed to the Doongarwadi office where we found Mr Jal Balsara sitting and relaxing. We asked Mr. Jal Balsara the reasons for leaving the ceremony half-way through. He told us that his fellow dastur Mr.Dara Karanjia is an incompetent priest, who could not even “read and pray” properly. We informed him that by leaving the Gehsarna ceremony half-way he has insulted the dead person. He in turn replied that Mr. Dara Karanjia was reading from the book and reciting prayers, and therefore could not keep pace with him. He further added that if he had continued any further praying along with Mr. Dara Karanjia, he would have been a partner in crime in insulting the departed soul. Thus according to Mr. Jal Balsara walking away in the middle of Gehsarna ceremony is not a sin or an insult to the dead but praying along with his colleague, who perhaps is not as well experienced as him and thus has to recite his prayers reading from the book, would have made him commit thousand of sins (paap na potla) and insult to the dead. Since he is a Man of God and thus answerable to the Almighty, he chose to walk away during Gehsarna ceremony.
This casual and careless reasoning on the part of Mr. Jal Balsara is an indication of the Man of God becoming an Almighty. The angry mourners were left dumb founded and shocked to the bone. I left the office immediately because if I had stayed there even a minute more, I would have done something unthinkable. It was the face of my dead brother which guided me out of the room. I take this opportunity to thank those angry mourners who showed great restrain and tried to talk through to find a solution. One of the mourners got in touch with the Bombay Parsi Panchayet. Two of the trustee viz. Mr. Dinshaw Mehta and Mr. Khojeste Mistry arrived at the Doongarwadi Office to resolve the crises. They requested Mr. Jal Balsara to at-least finish the Gehsarna Ceremony. The replacement priest was then called to perform Gehsarna ceremony which resumed an hour late. It was almost 12 noon when my brother was finally consigned to the Tower of Silence.
Dear Hamdins – I would like to put before you some of my thoughts and would request your valued opinions, suggestions :-
1) Was Mr. Jal Balsara justified in leaving the Gehsarna Ceremony ?
2) Was the reasoning given by Mr. Jal Balsara for leaving the Gehsarna Ceremony has any religious basis ?
3) Was abusing fellow priest in the middle of Gehsarna Ceremony is a justifiable act on the part of Mr. Jal Balsara according to the Zoroastrian religion ?
I understand from many of the mourners gathered that Mr. Jal Balsara has been the man controlling entire praying operation at Doongarwadi. All of us have to be, at one point or the other, at his mercy for carrying out the last rites of the departed soul of our near and dear one. Unfortunately, keeping in mind the seriousness of the situation, we the members of the family, have to be extremely cautious and restrain ourselves to ensure that the body of the departed member rests in the Tower of Silence. However, for man like Mr. Jal Balsara it is business as usual – more the bodies, good the business. For him time is of essence. He does not like any outside priest to perform any ceremony at Doongarwadi because it would deprive him of his share of money. Therefore to maintain control and dominance at Doongarwadi what could be a better occasion for him to lodge his displeasure or protest to the members of the dead person’s family? For priests like Mr. Jal Balsara control, dominance and money is everything, work and professional ethics can go to hell.
Unlike my other family members, I have never been a very religious person but more of an atheist. In fact this brother of mine, in his life time, must have spent lakhs of rupee going to Udwada to offer his prayers. That day I felt extremely sorry for my dead brother because even in his dreams he may not have imagined that a priest who is supposed to guide him in his last journey to the other world, would do so with utmost contempt and complete disregard to human decency towards departed soul because in his list of priorities for priestly life, money supersedes even moral values and ethics. Now that I have first hand experience of what actually happens at Doongarwadi, I would not like such men to lead me to the other world. I hereby declare my last Death Wish and request members of my family that the day I die, please do not take me to such a place but bury me elsewhere and use the money kept reserved in either educating a child or getting a shelter for poor and needy members of the community.
Lastly, I would not like to make any comment on the roles and duties of the trustees of Bombay Parsi Panchayet as according to them they have enough problems on their plate that they do not know where and how to start resolving them.
Minoo K Vaghchhipawalla Salsette Parsis Colony, Building No. 5,
18th April 2010. “B” wing, Flat No. 105, Old Pump House
Off Jijamata Rd, Andheri (E) Mumbai 93.
Phone – 28362305. Cell No. 9820105507
E-mail – minoo_k_v@yahoo.co.in
UPDATE 01: Please read a very balanced account of the same incident by Ervad Marzban Hathiram, editor of Frashogard.com
Link to Marzban’s article: http://www.frashogard.com/my-response-to-the-incident-at-dungerwadi



@Yezdy Palia,
Sir you say among other things that wise amongst us are debating the matter and that we will definitely take a step. How long will we go on debating and deliberating? People are ready to take wise decisions but for cussedness of a few.
Dear Mr. Piloo,
As long as even one person is dissatisfied, we have to debate and try and convince him. We are human beings each having the faculty of volition. We can not force anybody to take a stand that he does not agree. Because morality ends where force begins.That is why I stated let logic be the final arbiter. If everyone agrees on that, nobody will be forced to accept a stand that he does not agree on. However it must be pure logic.
Regards
Yazdy.
According to many, instead of imposition of views best thing would be to give option to the concerned persons without any element of coercion. No single system is free from being doubted as the best.
The concerned people already have an option given by the Parsi Panchayath and that is they can have their own arrangements. Parsi Panchayath does not have any objection.
However once the concerned person has chosen his own path, the Parsi Panchayath would wash their hands of them, you know one can not eat your cake and have it too.
Therefore my friend, do not take a hasty decision. It is easy to spoil a case in haste, it would then take a lot of pains to rectify the mistake.
The best possible method is to debate in a calm and friendly
manner and logically reason out and take a joint decision. Otherwise, we will be divided like the Shias and Sunnis, like the Roman Catholics and Protestants. Then the issue will be of the huge property held by the Panchayath. It will take years and years and lots of acrimony. Please do not precipitate matters and spoil everything created by our forefathers. We have a problem and it is not insurmountable.
We should get a handful of prominent people of substance to sit down and take a sensible decision.
Yezdi Palia,
Frankly, I am unable to comprehend what you meant to say. You have said “The concerned people already have an option given by the Parsi Panchayath and that is they can have their own arrangements. Parsi Panchayath does not have any objection”
First question for sake of clarification, which Punchayat you are referring to?.
Second question what is the nature of Option you are talking about. I am convince that there is some disconnect between you and what others are referring to. Please take no umbrage.
Please can you clarify on the above 2 aspects.
Thanks.
Dear Mr. Byram Sidhwa,
In the first place, could you tell me something about yourself please?
I am not aware that there are more than one Parsi Panchayath.
It is possible that there is some dissconnect between me and the others.
I am not able to follow as to where I have annoyed you. I have read in the past during the course of some other discussion, somebody mention that the reformist have an option and that is what I was referring to.
My intention was to create an understanding of the situation and not to create a discord.
Regards
Yazdy.
Wishing everyone a wonderful spring time !
Yazdy Palia,
Let me clarify, Yazdy, I am not all annoyed with you. In fact I seldom get annoyed even with my opponents. Having said that, let me tell you that there is a) Bombay Parsi Punchayat,
b) Surat Parsi Punchayet c) Pune Parsi Punchayet,
all with distinct set of Trustees. At least that is what in my knowledge.
It would be wrong to call any person not satisfied with the failed ‘system’ as a Reformist.In my view, adapting to circumstance does not mean REFORM. As for the person who misinformed you that there is an option, please ask that person to clarify. My apologies if I have hurt your feelings,
I remain,
Byram.
Thanks for briefing me about the various Parsi Panchayat. I agree with you that anybody who does not agree with a failed system need not be a reformist. For that matter I do not think that being a reformist is bad.
If our ancestors had not made changes, we would still be living in caves. You have not hurt my feelings. I do not easily get hurt.
My stand is that logic is the most powerful weapon and we should always go by it. There is something called inertia with most people, they do not wish to have any changes made. They do not wish to go out of their comfort zone. We should use all the persuasive powers at our disposal and make the changes by remaining within the system.
Regards
Yazdy.
@Byram,
It seems you have forgotten to mention Ahmedabad Parsee Punchayet.
@Yazdy,
For your information, no facilities whatsoever are provided at the Towers for those whose kith & kin have willed to be disposed off in a manner other than consigning the corpse to dakhmas.
Even though the Bunglis are unoccupied, they are not allowed to be used for prayer facilities unless the ‘traditional’ method is accepted.
Not only that but even priests of Fire Temples have been directed NOT to recite prayers for persons who have not willing to consign the corpse to the so called traditional resting place.
I trust whatever clarification was needed to remove your
doubts has been provided.
Dear Piloo and Byram,
This is what I was referring to when I mentioned that the panchayath has given you an option, have the corpse disposed off as you wish and have your own arrangements about the prayers.
Please note, I do not agree with this logic but this is what you are heading towards if you get on to the limbs. The matter needs more engagement with the panchayat, we should fight the system by remaining within the system. If need be get into some kind of arbitration with a person held in high esteem by both the groups.
We must take it up on different levels. For example the damage done to the environment when the corpses putrify in the tower of silence. A thorough study of the laws of the land must be made and find out if somewhere a rule of the land is being violated. It is only then that they will get ready for negotiation.
Regards
Yazdy.
Yazdy, I really appreciate what you are saying. Desai and Partners are very good lawyers in Bombay and maybe their partner Kayomurzd Billimoria could help and get involved into this matter.
Do approach them.
Jeannie
Dear Ms. Jeannie Antia,
Many thanks for your comments. However, I live in far away Kerala. In fact quite far from civilization as Mumbaikars know. At the moment, my hands are full and will not be able to approach Desai and Partners or any one else.
However, I will stand by rational Parsis. However, I believe that we have to use logic in our arguments and keep on debating till we have solved our problems. We have to persevere.
Regards
Yazdy.
WoW, Kerala must be so beautiful. They call it the untouched paradise of India!
Unfortunately I’m even farer off – I am in Hamburg / Germany, but next time I come to India I will look out for some rational Parsis and check out the legal rights of India!
Thank you for your kind words and stay happy!
Jeannie
Hi Jeannie,
Many thanks for the good wishes. Kerala is not what it used to be. Wayanad is fast changing too. I am fortunate that I have my estate touching the Wayanad wild life sanctuary and as such can not change. You still see part of its pristine beauty.
If you wish to keep in touch, you could write to me on yazdypalia@gmail.com
Regards
Yazdy.
Dear Yazdy, I will keep in touch ! Thank you so much for the offer.
Have a lovely weekend!
Jeannie